"High Stakes"
San Francisco Chronicle, June 19,2002
Bay Area at the forefront of the big-bucks battle between proponents of
grass-fed beef and traditional cattlemen .
By Kim Severson
Those grass-chomping steers sprawled along the hills of West Marin might
look peaceful enough, but they are at the center of a war being waged
on your dinner plate. Call it the battle of the beef.
For much of the spring, the virtues of beef raised on Northern California
pastures have been the talk of the Bay Area's top chefs. They argue that
grass- fed beef is better for your health, easier on the environment and
tastes better than what most Americans eat -- beef fattened on corn and
soy in huge feedlots in the Midwest.
In the other corner are the traditional cattlemen, who say America's appetite
for beef can't be sated on grass-fed alone. The fight even has respected
Marin County rancher Bill Niman on the ropes. His product -- grain- finished
beef served in the city's best restaurants -- is being dumped by those
chefs who think beef fed exclusively fresh pasture and stored silage is
a sustainable, healthier alternative.
"I just had my eyes opened, that's all," said Alice Waters,
owner of Chez Panisse and the mother of California cuisine. She still
serves Niman Ranch organic pork at her Berkeley restaurant, but the staff
is searching for the perfect local rancher to provide grass-fed beef.
Why care about what a handful of fancy Bay Area chefs and boutique ranchers
have to say? Because when it comes to food, the trends that start here
end up affecting how the rest of the country eats. The Bay Area's early
embrace of locally grown organic products, for example, is a large part
of the reason organic vegetables and goat cheese are sold in grocery stores
across the country.
What's more, culinary trendsetters say the local beef battle feeds into
a growing national debate about the safety and health of the nation's
$80 billion-a-year beef industry. It's an industry that relies on cattle
bulked up on hormones, daily doses of antibiotics and feed that can contain
chicken manure, feathers, rendered animal protein and cardboard fiber
-- all of which is allowed by current federal regulations.
"This latest interest in grass-fed is part of a broadening awareness
that people want more natural food -- food grown closer to home,"
said Ellie Rilla, director of the University of California cooperative
extension in Marin County.
Her office has put together seminars to help West Marin ranchers learn
more about managing pastures and raising natural beef.
The Marin Agricultural Land Trust has also taken an interest. Earlier
this spring, the ranchland preservation group organized a tour of Marin
Sun Farms, one of a handful of local grass-fed beef producers.
big apple beef
The trend might be hottest in the Bay Area, but it has the attention of
ranchers and restaurateurs in New York. Beef was the topic of a seminar
last month in Manhattan hosted by the Chefs' Collaborative, a 1,000-member
group that deems itself the social conscience of the restaurant world.
A star of the meeting was Larry Bain, general manager for Acme Chophouse
at Pacific Bell Park, the Bay Area's first high-end restaurant to serve
grass-fed beef.
Bain likens new beef to organic vegetables 15 or 20 years ago -- expensive,
hard to find, of inconsistent quality and prized only by people outside
the mainstream.
back to basics
U.S. cattle used to be raised on grass, as cattle still are in much of
the rest of the world. But increased demand for food after World War II
prompted ranchers to use inexpensive fertilizer to grow government-subsidized
corn, which is cheaper than grass and grows beef faster and fattier. Now,
a growing number of ranchers, environmentalists and consumer groups question
whether this method is healthy or ecologically sound.
"You're really talking about the last 25 to 30 years when the beef
system was transformed, in large part to meet the demands of fast-food
chains," said Eric Schlosser, author of the best-selling "Fast
Food Nation."
"The present system has huge, huge social and environmental costs
that we're just starting to realize," he said.
beef counter culture
The move against big beef has old roots here. Marin ranchers have grown
grass-fed beef for local consumption for years, although what little grass-fed
beef popped up in retail markets often has been tough, and off-tasting.
Orville Schell, who was a ranching partner with Niman before becoming
head of the University of California Graduate School of Journalism, published
in 1983 "Modern Meat: Antibiotics, Hormones and the Pharmaceutical
Farm," one of the first books to unblinkingly examine the amount
of chemicals used to grow cattle. And since the late 1960s, the Bay Area
has hosted a strong community of vegetarians.
A new crop of local chefs started paying attention to beef politics in
March, when an alliance of Northern California ranchers began selling
their grass-fed beef to a couple of high-end San Francisco restaurants.
About the same time, author Michael Pollan, former editor-at-large of
Harper's magazine, published a cover story in the New York Times magazine
that backers of the new beef hope will have as much impact on the beef
industry as did "The Jungle," Upton Sinclair's 1906 expose of
Chicago meatpacking plants.
Pollan bought a calf, and his story followed it from birth to slaughter.
He depicted massive Midwest feedlots built on manure and threaded through
troughs almost nine miles long, filled with a mixture of corn and antibiotics.
Corn, not a steer's natural feed, so upsets the animals' digestive system
that a constant stream of antibiotics is the only way to keep them thriving.
In addition, he argued, corn upsets the chemical balance in a steer's
stomach, affecting the animal's natural ability to fight bacteria and
making it more prone to pass on a particularly deadly strain of E. coli.
What really turned Waters' head was Pollan's argument that the beef industry
has replaced what was an efficient method for turning solar energy (grass)
into protein (meat) with a system based on oil in the form of petrochemical
fertilizers needed to grow the corn used to raise beef.
answered prayers
While the National Cattleman's Beef Association has called the article
misleading, Bay Area gourmets and chefs traded copies like they were swapping
recipes.
"When the article came out, I raised my eyes to heaven and said thank
you," said Ernest Phinney, general manager of Western Grasslands
Beef, an alliance of ranchers who were the first to sell grass-fed beef
to the Bay Area retail market and who have used Pollan's article as a
marketing tool. In just over two months, accounts have jumped from two
to 25.
Pollan is surprised by the response here. "I'm amazed you can come
to this area and write about beef and have it be such a big deal,"
he said during a visit earlier this month. He also didn't know the article
would drive some Niman Ranch customers away, angering Niman, who is considered
the area's pioneer of premium "natural" beef, raised with attention
to animal welfare, human health and environmental impact.
Niman was so concerned he e-mailed Pollan, saying, in part, "As you
know, the story is very complicated and the lay public considers all feedlot
cattle the same. This is absolutely not true."
Niman, a man embraced by chefs for his steaks, by environmentalists for
his adherence to the Animal Welfare Institute slaughter protocols, and
by family ranchers for helping to keep them in business, is caught in
the middle. He believes beef raised mostly on pasture but finished on
grain simply tastes better.
"People want to imagine a beautiful vision of a chicken out there
eating earwigs and cows roaming free around the pasture," Niman said.
"To feed millions of people every day? No way. If they want to eat
grass-fed, they have to think of this as a seasonal thing like a peach
or a tomato. Eat it in May or June 'cause that is when it is peaking."
rehashed debate
Others in the beef business say this latest fascination is just another
turn in the barrel for the romantic notion of free-range, grass-fed cattle,
which the American palate simply won't accept on any large scale.
"We try and reinvent this wheel about every 10 or 20 years in the
United States whenever the price of beef goes up," said Jim Oltjen,
a UC Davis beef specialist who grew up working the feedlots of northeastern
Kansas. "There are some real hang-ups with grass-fed beef and the
American consumer, who wants that corn-fed beef taste. And if we only
produce grass-fed beef, we'll only produce half of what we produce now."
But many chefs aren't convinced. Laurence Jossel of the high-volume Chow
and Park Chow restaurants in San Francisco recently switched his $50,000-a-
year ground beef business from Niman to grass-fed.
"I love the stuff," he said. "And overall, karmicly speaking,
I think it's the right thing to do."
|